"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

Forum

Prosperity for All Americans

Is that so scary!!! To some YES!!!
 

Links to other Pages

Home

DayCare

Economy

Education

Environmental

Financial Reform

Gun Reform

Healthcare Reform

Immigration Reform

Mental Illness

Money in Politics

Political Images and Cartoons

Poverty

Prison Reform

Safety Nets

Veterans' Issues

Voting Rights

Women's' Issues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Social Safety Nets in America

Oldest Page 1, 2 Newest Addition

 

Americans Would Prefer Denmark Social Safety Net & Taxes If Informed

http://egbertowillies.com/2013/05/27/americans-would-prefer-denmark-social-safety-net-taxes-if-informed/

Last year Denmark was ranked the happiest country in world. This year Denmark is ranked the second happiest country in the world topped only by Norway. They are both successful high tax, very good social safety net (universal healthcare, unemployment compensation, retraining, free or affordable higher education, etc.) countries. They are both democratic.

Denmark and other Scandinavian countries weathered the 2008 Great Depression better than most of Europe and the United States. They did this even with what Americans would consider a bloated public sector.

Many will argue that these countries are small in comparison to the US and as such it is not a good comparison. Many will argue that the wealth from North Sea Oil reserves is partly the reason. Many will argue that because these countries are strong welfare states that they are less competitive.

The reality is Americans have been lied to or allowed to wallow in their own ignorance. They have been taught to believe fallacies that counter one’s intuition. Once this indoctrination is complete, change towards progress is non-existent or painfully slow.

If one is to believe in the economy of scale, America’s size makes efficiency even more possible than in these small countries. America is extremely rich with natural resources, not only oil. The problem is that it is distributed unfairly among the few that ‘stole’ it or bought it on the cheap (e.g.,25 families own 1% of all land and the resources of that land in America).

Denmark and other Scandinavian countries’ with strong social safety nets have not made them less competitive. In fact they are way at the top of the list with the United States. Most other countries at the top have strong social safety nets as well. As a society they care more for the social, economic, and health well-being of their fellow citizens than America.

One of the reasons Denmark and other Scandinavian countries with strong social safety nets weathered the Great Recession better is that they had a built in stimulus. In America when one loses a job, they get unemployment for a short time (this recession was an exception). That unemployment is much less than wages and runs out quickly. That means the contribution to the economy by that laid off worker makes a recession much worse as much less money is entered into the economy. In countries with strong safety nets, workers get up to 90% of their wages. As such the economic shock from unemployment is mitigated till the economy’s ‘overstock’ is mitigated until increased employment is required.

In America we are encouraged to disregard logic and obvious reality for the sake of ideology. The ideology is present to maintain not only a status quo, but a country where only a select few will ever have the opportunity to be wealthy. It is a ‘me first’ and selfish ideology. It is an ideology where wealth is built on the backs of the middle class and the poor, Class Warfare.

 This exceptional new ad from Alaska shows how Democrats everywhere should be running on Obamacare


In the ad, born-and-raised Alaskan Lisa Keller—"a mother, a runner, a breast cancer survivor"—jogs through a snowbound Anchorage, explaining she was "lucky" because she "beat cancer." "But," she continues, "the insurance companies still denied me health insurance, just because of a pre-existing condition." However, she adds, "I now have health insurance again, because of Mark Begich. Because he fought the insurance companies so that we no longer have to."
You can't offer a message simpler and more heartening than that. This is precisely the kind of sympathetic story that Americans for Prosperity wished it could tell, except this one happens to be completely true and gets to the very core of what's best about the Affordable Care Act. You want to run on repealing Obamacare? You're literally running on repealing Lisa Keller's health insurance. The stakes couldn't be clearer.

 

 

 

 

 

 Republicans Insist That The Social Safety Net is a 'Poverty-Trap'

 

 

 

 

 

 The GOP: 'Clueless, Heartless and Gutless'

 

 

 


 

 

 You're Subsidizing Wal-Mart's Low Wages

Usually when people discuss the minimum wage, they say it will create unemployment, which may be true, but at the same time employment is artificially high, because we are subsidizing low wages. In this video I give you a simple economic model to show you this.

 

 

 


 

 

 
Community Based Targeting Mechanisms
for Social Safety Nets

http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/CBTFinal.doc
Jonathan Conning

Michael Kevane**

December, 2000
 



Summary. -- This paper interprets case studies and theory on community involvement in beneficiary selection and benefit delivery for social safety nets. Several considerations should be carefully balanced in assessing the advantages of using community groups as targeting agents. First, benefits from utilizing local information and social capital may be eroded by costly rent-seeking. Second, the potential improvement in targeting criteria from incorporating local notions of deprivation must be tempered by the possibility of program capture by local elites, and by the possibility that local preferences are not pro-poor. Third, performance may be undermined by unforeseen strategic targeting by local communities in response to national funding and evaluation criteria, or by declines in political support.

Keywords: poverty alleviation; targeting; safety net; political economy; community; welfare.

** Williams College, Department of Economics, Williamstown, MA and Institute for Economic Development, Boston University. jconning@williams.edu; Santa Clara University, Department of Economics, Santa Clara, CA 95053. mkevane@scu.edu (corresponding author).
We would like to extend our thanks to Harold Alderman, Pranab Bardhan, John Blomquist, Henry Bruton, Michael Cernea, Nora Dudwick, John Giles, Margaret Grosh, William Jack, Emmanuela Galasso, Eric Hanson, Simon Harrigan, Daniel Klein, Alexandre Marc, Jessica Mott, Akbar Noman, Albert Park, Tamara Perkins, Ashok Rai, Vivajendra Rao, Gustav Ranis, Martin Ravallion, Mary E. Schmidt, Endre Stiansen, William Sundstrom and participants at a World Bank workshop for providing input, suggestions and material. Nishant Nayyer provided able research assistance.
 

Introduction
 

Social safety nets can serve an important role in alleviating poverty and in promoting long-term growth by providing households with the protection that markets and informal networks may not supply. A social safety net may redistribute resources toward disadvantaged groups, or sustain political coalitions to support critical structural reforms. Unfortunately, the growing awareness of the importance social safety nets in developing countries has not been translated into effective action because of the failure of traditional social welfare ministries to effectively reach and engage the poor. This has led to experimentation with new bottom-up service delivery options and poverty alleviation mechanisms that more actively involve the poor and their communities in program design, implementation and monitoring. Examples include reforms that decentralize the delivery of public services to local governments, community management of forests and other natural resources, and group-based microcredit programs. Demand-driven social funds that aim by design to elicit community involvement have become increasingly popular with governments and donors, and international organizations such as the World Bank now make community participation an explicit criterion for funding approval for a growing list of projects (World Bank 1996)  To Read more, click here

 

Oldest Page 1, 2 Newest Addition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As Americans, we can do better.  We need to strive for excellence and a better way of life for our children!!!!
 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, health, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. 
   
 

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens
can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever does."
 -Margaret Mead